November 09, 2008
essay #2 - M/s v D/s v DD
Today i am feeling like i need to do something constructive so Sir suggested working on some of my outstanding training. i've had the 'BDSM knowledge and skills' training for what seems like foreverrrrrrrrr so i've decided to get a move on and finish up the last 2 essays that Sir requires and then it will be done, so here goes:
~ what are the main differences between D/s, M/s and DD relationships, and do they all fall under the BDSM umbrella or not?
From reading articles on this subject, it seems to me that although there are differences between these 3 types of relationship, the main difference is in people's preferences - what they want to identify with - rather than in actual lifestyles. i would say there are many more similarities between these 3 types of lifestyle, than there are differences, but for some reason people who are DD seem to dislike being associated with BDSM or D/s, and people who are D/s don't tend to view DD as being a 'proper' BDSM style relationship. So i'm going to look more closely at the main differences and then come to my own conclusion about whether they really do all fall under the BDSM umbrella.
i've written before about the differences between subs and slaves, and this is really the same for the differences between D/s and M/s relationships - M/s takes it a degree further, makes the control more absolute and encompassing, has stricter rules and consequences, and extends the dynamic to all aspects of the couple's lives. Often there are more rituals and outward signs in a M/s relationship, such as a collar, a ceremony, a contract, a brand/piercing/tattoo, etc. And i tend to see M/s relationships as being intended as more of a lifetime commitment, though in reality i'm not sure how often that happens. So i would say that both M/s and D/s definitely fall under the BDSM umbrella because they contain elements of discipline, Domination, submission, and often bondage, sadism and masochism as part of the physical side (though not always) -it's just that M/s is further along the scale than D/s is.
Now for the tricky part - analysing where DD fits into all this. i did a lot of reading on the 'Taken in Hand' site and also on this blog, and it seems i was right to think that most DDers don't want to be categorised as practicing BDSM. The articles i read seemed to think that DD dynamics are more about the relationship between the 2 people whereas D/s ones are more about the 'play' or 'scening' elements, though i would disagree with that from my own experience. There seem to be more rules and rituals in a D/s relationship, whereas DDers make it up as they go along - if the man decides the woman needs a spanking then he gives her one. There is less focus on roles within a DD relationship, so no need for contracts, rituals, agreements, etc. And DDers focus on the control of the man rather than the submissiveness of the woman - infact some DD women are spirited and bratty and mischievious rather than submissive. They want to be made to comply and disciplined when they don't, and that's seen as fine in the context of a DD relationship, whereas it would be seen as stepping out of line in a D/s one. But the main difference i noted was that DD relationships are more narrowly focused - they only use spanking as a means of control, and this is what they concentrate on. There's no mention of other activities/play/scenes beyond this, it's not necessarily seen as arousing or sexual, there's often no rules or rituals or contracts beyond 'the man makes all the decisions'. So maybe DD is a subset of BDSM, with a much narrower focus and not including all the other elements? There is discipline involved, and some would say sadism and masochism (though DDers are often reluctant to identify with those terms), and there is Dominance and submission because the woman has agreed to let the man take the lead and spank her at will. There may not be bondage but that's only a small part of the BDSM umbrella in my view.







4 comments:
I enjoyed this essay. A lot of people who tackle this subject tend to put down those who are not in the same lifestyle. A lot of M/s blogs that I've come across have written DD off as some sort of game a couple will play with each other. I think you described M/s D/s and DD very well.
3:21 PMMeasha (who has no idea where she fall into these "categories" anymore but is having fun finding out)
thanks Measha :) And i don't think it matters where you categorise yourself, or what label other people put on you, so long as you are happy with the lifestyle you have chosen
4:15 PMlibby
xxxxx
"DDers focus on the control of the man rather than the submissiveness of the woman - infact some DD women are spirited and bratty and mischievious rather than submissive. They want to be made to comply and disciplined when they don't, and that's seen as fine in the context of a DD relationship, whereas it would be seen as stepping out of line in a D/s one."
5:01 AMIt was a real relief for me to read this comment because I have been so confused about this. I am currently hoping to enter into a relationship with a particular Dom and I've been unsure of whether my natural behaviour would be considered 'normal' sub behaviour or not. My natural behaviour is to *not* be bratty or mischevious but rather to be actively submissive - i.e. to focus on my own submission rather than on His control. But I was worried that my particular Dom might think this would make me too boring for him. After reading this I feel more confident to focus on and express my own submission without trying to think for Him as well as for myself.
hi again Leanne :)
9:49 AMIn my experience most Doms don't like bratty subs, at least not for any long-term involvement (though sometimes they seem to enjoy flirting and playing with them in the short-term, e.g. on a chatroom). i imagine it becomes a bit like a teacher having a bratty pupil in the class - very trying after a while. The most important thing is to be yourself in the relationship and let your Dom guide you as to how He wants you to behave with Him.
Post a Comment